I have been arrested, do I need a lawyer?

Yes. Very serious! CALL NOW! 312-913-1111

I am being investigated by the FBI, DEA, IRS, SEC, USPIS or the Police, do I need a lawyer?

Yes. It's Very serious! CALL NOW! 312-913-1111

I am afraid to talk about my case on the phone, what should I do?

Call ASAP to schedule a confidential office meeting with criminal lawyer, Michael J. Petro. 312-913-1111

What type of people do you normally represent?

My office represents male and females of all races, nationalities, religions and sexual orientation.

Are you familiar with immigration laws?

Yes. My office is highly-sensitive to the special needs of resident and non-resident aliens involved in the criminal justice system.

Fees are based on a number factors including anticipated time involved in your representation, seriousness of the charged offense and complexity of the potential trial issues. To set up a confidential office meeting,CALL NOW! 312-913-1111

Michael J. Petro | Defense Attorney Near Me | Criminal Defense Lawyer in Chicago, IL

Name: Michael J. Petro Chicago Criminal Defense Attorney
Address: 20 N Clark St Ste 720, Chicago, IL, 60602, US
Telephone: 312-913-1111

“Snitches Are a Dying Breed” And Other Aspects of “Outlaw” Criminal Forfeiture

Posted on September 9, 2016October 25, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

US v. Joshua N. Bowser. Appeal of: Bradley W. Carlson. No. 15-2258. This appeal involves the government’s efforts to seize personal property bearing the insignia of the Outlaws Motorcycle Club (the “Outlaws”), and the effort of a representative of the Outlaws to intervene to prevent those forfeitures. The forfeiture actions stemmed from criminal cases brought against […]

Grand Jury Subpoena to Client’s Accountant: Attorney-Client Privilege May Block Production

Posted on August 26, 2016October 25, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

In the Matter of GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS, Involving William Thullen and Kenneth Dvorak, Witnesses Before the Special January, 1999-2 Grand Jury Nos. 99-3131, 99-3317. A grand jury investigating alleged tax fraud by Dr. Basaam Osman subpoenaed numerous documents from two accounting firms hired by his attorneys. Dr. Osman sought to block production of the documents. He […]

Writ of Coram Nobis – Boilerplate Rules You Need to Know

Posted on August 8, 2016October 26, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

US v. Brian Wilkozek, No. 15-1537. In 2003 Brian Wilkozek pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud for his participation in a mortgage-fraud scheme. By the time the third-party lenders uncovered the scheme, all they could do was foreclose and sell the properties. They suffered losses of more than $700,000. After Wilkozek was caught and […]

DEA’s Use of “Stingray” Device Without a Warrant is Illegal

Posted on July 13, 2016October 26, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

US v. Raymond Lambis, 15cr734 (SDNY, Judge Pauley, July 12, 2016). In 2015, the Drug Enforcement Administration (the “DEA”) conducted an investigation into an international drug-trafficking organization. As a part of that investigation, the DEA sought a warrant for pen register information and cell site location information (“CSLI”) for a target cell phone. CSLI allows […]

28 U.S.C. § 455 – Judge’s Failure to Recuse Himself Leads to REVERSAL

Posted on June 22, 2016October 26, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

US v. Jose Herrera-Valdez, No. 14-3534 Jose Gustavo Herrera-Valdez was prosecuted for illegal reentry after being deported. Before trial, he filed a motion to disqualify the District Court Judge from presiding over his prosecution because the judge served as the District Counsel for the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) at the time Herrera-Valdez was deported. Because we […]

U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Loss Amount: Money Paid Back to Victim Before Fraud Detected NOT Counted

Posted on June 2, 2016October 26, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

US v. Christian Peterson. No. 14-3716. Before running into legal trouble, Christian Peterson, an entrepreneur doing business in Madison, Wisconsin, owned several manufacturing and realestate development firms. He misused corporate finances, frequently making unauthorized intercompany loans and occasionally using corporate funds to pay off his personal gambling debts. Eventually all of his business ventures failed, […]

Government’s Pretrial Seizure of Defendant’s Untainted Assets NOT Allowed

Posted on May 20, 2016November 2, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

Sila Luis v. US, No. 14-419. (United States Supreme Court March 30, 2016) A federal statute provides that a court may freeze before trial certain assets belonging to a criminal defendant accused of violations of federal health care or banking laws. See 18 U. S. C. §1345. Those assets include: (1) property “obtained as a result […]

Polling Jury After Verdict: Dissenting Juror Impermissibly Coerced Leads to Reversal.

Posted on May 12, 2016November 2, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

USA v. LEMUREL E. WILLIAMS, No. 15-1194 Lemurel Williams was convicted of being a felon in possession of a gun. We agree with Williams’s that a new trial is needed because the totality of the circumstances regarding the jury’s verdict was impermissibly coercive. After three hours of deliberating, the jury returned a guilty verdict, […]

Residential Drug Abuse Program – BOP Changes Make Allow Greater Inmate Participation

Posted on May 2, 2016November 2, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) revised the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP) regulations to allow greater inmate participation in the program and positively impact recidivism rates. DATES: This rule is effective on May 26, 2016. 550.55(b) Inmates not Eligible for Early Release. As an exercise of the Director’s discretion, the following categories of […]

Expunging Your Federal Conviction – Rules You Need to Know

Posted on April 19, 2016October 26, 2021 by Michael J. Petro

U.S. v PFEIFFER, Case No. 04 CR 793, U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. (Editor’s note: This is a District Court decision NOT 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.) April 7, 2016 In 2007, Brian Pfeiffer pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, Ecstasy. Pfeiffer now moves to expunge the records […]

“Snitches Are a Dying Breed” And Other Aspects of “Outlaw” Criminal Forfeiture

Category: 7th Circuit Criminal Law Alert

“Snitches Are a Dying Breed” And Other Aspects of “Outlaw” Criminal Forfeiture

Grand Jury Subpoena to Client’s Accountant: Attorney-Client Privilege May Block Production

Writ of Coram Nobis – Boilerplate Rules You Need to Know

DEA’s Use of “Stingray” Device Without a Warrant is Illegal

28 U.S.C. § 455 – Judge’s Failure to Recuse Himself Leads to REVERSAL

U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Loss Amount: Money Paid Back to Victim Before Fraud Detected NOT Counted

Government’s Pretrial Seizure of Defendant’s Untainted Assets NOT Allowed

Polling Jury After Verdict: Dissenting Juror Impermissibly Coerced Leads to Reversal.

Residential Drug Abuse Program – BOP Changes Make Allow Greater Inmate Participation

Expunging Your Federal Conviction – Rules You Need to Know

Trust the Top Google Reviewed Law Firm in Chicago

© 2019 Michael J. Petro