Anticipatory Search Warrants and Triggering Conditions
Police may obtain a search warrant before evidence arrives at the location to be searched. This is known as an anticipatory search warrant. The warrant is generally executed only after a specified future event, called the triggering condition, establishes that the evidence is likely to be present.
If federal...
Federal Wiretaps and the Title III Necessity Requirement
Federal agents cannot obtain a wiretap merely by showing that intercepted conversations might produce useful evidence. Title III requires the government to explain why ordinary investigative procedures have failed, appear unlikely to succeed, or would be too dangerous.
If federal prosecutors obtained evidence from intercepted telephone calls, text messages,...
Consent to Search a Home and the Voluntariness Requirement
A person does not have to allow police to search a home merely because officers ask for permission. When the government relies on consent instead of a warrant, prosecutors must prove that the consent was voluntary and that police remained within their permitted scope.
If police entered or searched...
StingRay Cell Phone Tracking and the Fourth Amendment
Cellphones can reveal an extraordinary amount of information about where a person goes, where a person lives, and with whom a person associates.
Federal law enforcement agencies have used devices commonly known as StingRays to locate cellphones with far greater precision than traditional cell-tower records may provide.
When Can Police Search a Cell Phone Without a Warrant?
Police may seize a cell phone during a lawful arrest, but they generally cannot search its digital contents without first obtaining a warrant. Modern phones contain messages, photographs, financial information, location history, medical records, and years of personal communications. The Fourth Amendment provides substantial protection for that information.
If...
Can Police Stop a Vehicle Leaving a Suspected Drug House?
Police cannot stop a vehicle merely because it leaves a house or property associated with suspected drug activity. A vehicle stop is a Fourth Amendment seizure, and officers ordinarily need particularized reasonable suspicion directed at the vehicle, driver, or occupants.
If police stopped your vehicle because you visited or...
Charges Dismissed After Motion to Suppress Filed in Pinellas County Drug Case
Attorney Michael J. Petro is pleased to announce a successful defense result: Pinellas County drug charges against Mr. Eric Eugene Mozell, Sr. were dismissed after Attorney Petro filed a Motion to Suppress challenging the legality of the traffic stop and vehicle search. The case involved serious allegations of trafficking in cocaine and...
Search Warrants and the Leon Good Faith Exception: Boilerplate Rules
A court's conclusion that a search warrant lacked probable cause does not necessarily mean the evidence will be suppressed.
That surprises many criminal defendants.
The reason is the Leon good-faith exception.
In United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984),...
How Long Can Police Hold a Cell Phone Before Getting a Warrant?
Police generally need a search warrant before examining the digital contents of a cell phone. But obtaining a warrant does not automatically make every seizure reasonable. Officers must also act diligently after taking the device and cannot hold it indefinitely while delaying the warrant application.
If police seized your...
Federal Motion to Suppress Evidence Attorney
Evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search or seizure can sometimes be excluded from a criminal prosecution. A successful motion to suppress can prevent prosecutors from using critical evidence and, in some cases, can substantially weaken or even eliminate the government's case.
Federal motion-to-suppress attorney Michael J. Petro has over...