Choosing Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro

Bruton and Redactions of Co-defendant Statements at Trial: Boilerplate Rules

The Bruton Rule and Redacted Codefendant Confessions

A federal prosecutor may seek to introduce one defendant’s confession during a joint trial involving several defendants. A serious Confrontation Clause problem arises when the confession incriminates a codefendant, but the person who made the statement does not testify...

Bruton and Redactions of Co-defendant Statements at Trial: Boilerplate Rules Continue reading…
Choosing Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro

Federal Rule of Evidence 413: Court’s Interpretation of Word “Accused” is Overly Broad and Error

Prior Sexual Misconduct Evidence Under Rules 413 and 414

Federal prosecutors may attempt to introduce allegations of prior sexual misconduct to persuade a jury that the defendant has a propensity to commit the charged offense. Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 414 permit this type of...

Federal Rule of Evidence 413: Court’s Interpretation of Word “Accused” is Overly Broad and Error Continue reading…
Choosing Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro

The Limits of Cross-Examination of a Government Snitch: Boilerplate Rules

Cross-Examining Government Informants in Federal Court

Federal prosecutors frequently build criminal cases around cooperating witnesses, confidential informants, and codefendants who expect something in return for their testimony. A witness may hope to avoid charges, reduce a mandatory minimum sentence, receive money, obtain immigration assistance, or secure...

The Limits of Cross-Examination of a Government Snitch: Boilerplate Rules Continue reading…
Choosing Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro

FRE 801 (d)(2)(E) and Co-Conspirator Hearsay: District Court’s Failure to Make Explicit Findings on Admissability is Not Error

Challenging Coconspirator Statements Under Rule 801(d)(2)(E)

Federal prosecutors frequently introduce statements made outside the courtroom by alleged members of a conspiracy. These statements may include recorded calls, text messages, emails, testimony from informants, and conversations repeated by cooperating witnesses.

The government cannot admit...

FRE 801 (d)(2)(E) and Co-Conspirator Hearsay: District Court’s Failure to Make Explicit Findings on Admissability is Not Error Continue reading…
Choosing Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro

Drug Experts and Interpreting Words in Recorded Conversations: Boilerplate Rules and Analysis

When Federal Agents Interpret Coded Drug Conversations

Federal drug prosecutions frequently rely on recorded telephone calls, text messages, and intercepted conversations. The government may claim that ordinary words, numbers, or phrases are coded references to drugs, quantities, prices, or participants.

Federal agents cannot...

Drug Experts and Interpreting Words in Recorded Conversations: Boilerplate Rules and Analysis Continue reading…
Choosing Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro

Narcotics Police Officer Not an Expert Under FRE 702

Challenging Police Expert Testimony Under Federal Rule 702

Federal prosecutors frequently offer law enforcement officers as experts on drug trafficking organizations, coded language, distribution quantities, drug values, packaging, and common practices. An officer’s experience may qualify the officer to testify about certain specialized subjects, but experience...

Narcotics Police Officer Not an Expert Under FRE 702 Continue reading…