Honest Services Fraud – “Value of Benefit Received” Explained

United States v. Harper, No. 14-2701.   The defendant pleaded guilty to fraud consisting of her having abused her position as a member of a Chicago public-school board by accepting kickbacks of more than $500,000 from bus companies to which she steered transportation contracts worth $21 million. The parties stipulated that the value of...

Honest Services Fraud – “Value of Benefit Received” Explained Continue reading…

USSG 2B1.1 – Honest Services Fraud “Value of Benefit Received” Explained

United States v. Harper, No. 14-2701.   The defendant pleaded guilty to fraud consisting of her having abused her position as a member of a Chicago public-school board by accepting kickbacks of more than $500,000 from bus companies to which she steered transportation contracts worth $21 million. The parties stipulated that the value of...

USSG 2B1.1 – Honest Services Fraud “Value of Benefit Received” Explained Continue reading…

Eyewitness Identification – Watershed Decision Identifies Fallibility of Eyewitness Identifications

People of the State of Illinois v. Eduardo Lerma, No. 118496.

Editor’s Note –  This is an Illinois Supreme Court Opinion.

The issue is whether, in light of the specific facts and circumstances of this case, the circuit court of Cook County abused its discretion...

Eyewitness Identification – Watershed Decision Identifies Fallibility of Eyewitness Identifications Continue reading…

Eyewitness Identification – Watershed Decision Identifies Fallibility of Eyewitness Identifications

People of the State of Illinois v. Eduardo Lerma, No. 118496.

Editor’s Note –  This is an Illinois Supreme Court Opinion.

The issue is whether, in light of the specific facts and circumstances of this case, the circuit court of Cook County abused its discretion...

Eyewitness Identification – Watershed Decision Identifies Fallibility of Eyewitness Identifications Continue reading…

U.S.S.G. Section 3C1.1 Obstruction of Justice – 7th Circuit Brief Filed

PRESS RELEASE (Chicago).  On December 9, 2015 Chicago Federal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro filed a brief in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of his client Charles Thomas. US v. Charles Thomas, 15-1142.  In sum, Mr. Thomas states that the district court erred in applying the United States Sentencing Guidelines...

U.S.S.G. Section 3C1.1 Obstruction of Justice – 7th Circuit Brief Filed Continue reading…