Inevitable Discovery Rule Car Stop Inventory Search: Boilerplate Search and Seizure Analysis

United States of America v. Dewayne Cartwright,  No. 10-1879.

Police pulled Dewayne Cartwright over for a traffic violation, arrested him when he failed to produce a driver’s license and gave a false name, then searched the car incident to his arrest, locating a gun in the back seat.

Inevitable Discovery Rule Car Stop Inventory Search: Boilerplate Search and Seizure Analysis Continue reading…

Motion to Suppress Identification: Boilerplate Rules for Finding an Independent Basis for an In-Court Identification

United States of America v. Edward W. West, 10-1292

Edward W. West was charged with two counts of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d), and two counts of using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

Motion to Suppress Identification: Boilerplate Rules for Finding an Independent Basis for an In-Court Identification Continue reading…

Warning!!! Pre-Trial Motions for Severence Must Be Renewed at Close of Evidence or They Are Waived on Appeal

USA v.  Clarence E. Plato and Bishop C. Graham.  09-2099 and 2716.

Clarence Plato and Bishop Graham were jointly tried and convicted by a jury of distributing crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Law enforcement officers caught the pair on videotape selling crack cocaine to a...

Warning!!! Pre-Trial Motions for Severence Must Be Renewed at Close of Evidence or They Are Waived on Appeal Continue reading…

Supervised Release Violations May Be Sentenced Concurrent To New Conviction

USA v. Lawrence Taylor, 10-1304.  Appellant Lawrence Taylor appeals from his sentences for bank robbery and for violating the terms of his supervised release relating to an earlier bank robbery conviction.

Because the district court erred by failing to appreciate its discretion to impose the sentences either consecutively or concurrently,...

Supervised Release Violations May Be Sentenced Concurrent To New Conviction Continue reading…

Sentence Based on Clearly Erroneous Facts Is Procedural Plain Error

USA v. Juan Corona-Gonzalez.  09-3993.

Juan Corona-Gonzalez seeks review of a sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. A jury found Mr. Corona-Gonzalez guilty of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine and possession of...

Sentence Based on Clearly Erroneous Facts Is Procedural Plain Error Continue reading…

FRE 901 (b)(5) and Lay Opinion Voice Identification Testimony: Boilerplate Rules

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROSALIO CRUZ-REA and ZOYLA GARCIA-REA Nos. 09-3591, 10-1355

Law enforcement authorities launched an investigation in the summer of 2007 into the shipment of cocaine from California and Utah to Indianapolis, Indiana. During the course of this investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) obtained...

FRE 901 (b)(5) and Lay Opinion Voice Identification Testimony: Boilerplate Rules Continue reading…

Missing Witness Instruction and Missing Confidential Informant: Boilerplate Rules

USA v. Lorenzo Tavarez, 09-3879. 

Based on information provided by a confidential informant, appellant Lorenzo Tavarez was arrested and charged with two counts of distributing methamphetamine. Despite the informant's unexplained absence at trial, a jury convicted Tavarez on all charges.

Tavarez now argues that the district...

Missing Witness Instruction and Missing Confidential Informant: Boilerplate Rules Continue reading…

Crack Cocaine Mandatory Minimum Reductions Under Fair Sentencing Act Do Not Apply Retroactively

USA v. Christopher C. Bell, 09-3908 & 09-3914. 

A jury convicted Christopher Bell of distributing more than five grams of cocaine base. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced him to 292 months in prison, revoked his previous term of supervised release, and sentenced him to an...

Crack Cocaine Mandatory Minimum Reductions Under Fair Sentencing Act Do Not Apply Retroactively Continue reading…

USSG 5K3.1. District Court’s Can Consider Absense of Fast Track Programs at Sentencing

USA v. JAIME REYES-HERNANDEZ, 091249.  USA v. PEDRO SANCHEZ-GONZALEZ, 09-1551.

The Supreme Court's decision in Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007), taken together with other recent cases, has rekindled debate about whether sentencing disparities created by fast-track programs can be considered by district court judges in non-fast-track districts when...

USSG 5K3.1. District Court’s Can Consider Absense of Fast Track Programs at Sentencing Continue reading…