Supervised Release Is Not Mandatory: New Rules Regarding Non Mandatory Conditions

United States v. Thompson, et al., No. 14-1316  

In considering four consolidated cases, the Court of Appeals held that district court’s must consider the § 3553(a) factors when imposing all non-mandatory conditions of supervised release, including standard conditions of supervised release.

Supervised release, in contrast...

Supervised Release Is Not Mandatory: New Rules Regarding Non Mandatory Conditions Continue reading…

Chicago Federal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro Success at Dirksen

Success at Dirksen Building. Chicago Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro fought tooth and nail against the government’s Petition for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture. The petition sought proceeds and specific property including substitute assets. The Judge listened to Mr. Petro’s arguments and dismissed the government’s petition. Savings to client $550K!

Chicago Federal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro Success at Dirksen Continue reading…

USSG 2D1.1: Court’s Failure to Explicitly State Drug Quantity Leads to Reversal

United States v. Garrett.    No. 13-1182.

Background. Dwayne Garrett was found guilty of possessing with intent to distribute 50 or more grams of crack cocaine and sentenced to 190 months in prison. He appeals both his conviction and sentence.

Garrett was indicted, along with more...

USSG 2D1.1: Court’s Failure to Explicitly State Drug Quantity Leads to Reversal Continue reading…

7th Circuit Announces New Standard for Admitting FRE 404(b) Other Acts Evidence

On August 18, 2014, the 7th Circuit in a 43 page opinion annonced a new standard for admitting FRE 404(b) other acts evidence.  The new standard was announced in an en banc opinion in  US v. Gomez, 12-1104 (7th Cir. 2014)   .    

Chicago Federal Criminal Defense Attorney Michael J. Petro represented Gomez at his Motion to...

7th Circuit Announces New Standard for Admitting FRE 404(b) Other Acts Evidence Continue reading…

Police Officer’s Good Faith Mistake of Law is NOT Reasonable Grounds for a Traffic Stop

USA v. Demarco L. McDonald,  453 F.3d 958 (7th Cir. 2006)   

(Editor’s note:  the United States Sureme Court granted cert in Heien v. North Carolina, No. 13-604 on  this issue:  Whether a police officer’s mistake of law can provide the individualized
suspicion that the Fourth Amendment requires to justify a traffic...

Police Officer’s Good Faith Mistake of Law is NOT Reasonable Grounds for a Traffic Stop Continue reading…

Trial Exhibits In the Jury Room: Boilerplate Rules

United States v. Loughry No.13-1385.   

BACKGROUND. In 2007, United States Postal Inspection Service (“USPIS”) inspectors discovered that an internet bulletin board site called “the Cache” was providing users with access to images and videos depicting child pornography. After obtaining a search warrant, USPIS inspectors seized the Cache’s contents and...

Trial Exhibits In the Jury Room: Boilerplate Rules Continue reading…