Ex-Wife Has Actual and Apparent Authority to Consent to Search of Ex-Husband’s Home

United States v. Ryerson, No. 07-1654 (7th Cir. 09/18/2008)

Defendant Richard Ryerson challenges his conviction and sentence for possessing a machine gun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). Ryerson claims the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress the machine gun, which was found in Ryerson's garage...

Ex-Wife Has Actual and Apparent Authority to Consent to Search of Ex-Husband’s Home Continue reading…

Convictions With Mens Rae of Negligence or Recklessness Cannot Serve as Predicate Violent Felony Under Armed Career Criminal Act

United States v. Smith, No. 07-1853 (7th Cir. 09/12/2008)

Steven Smith was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). The district court found that Mr. Smith qualified for an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act,...

Convictions With Mens Rae of Negligence or Recklessness Cannot Serve as Predicate Violent Felony Under Armed Career Criminal Act Continue reading…

Government Is Not Allowed to Use Defendant’s Proffer Protected Statements to Increase Relevant Conduct Drug Amount

U.S. v. Douglas Farmer, James Ellis, Josiah Compton, and Gerald Howliet, Nos. 07-2505, 07-2506, 07-2507 and 07-3313.  This is a consolidated appeal from the convictions of four out of fourteen defendants for various offenses stemming from a drug distribution ring in the East St. Louis, Illinois area.

Compton was convicted...

Government Is Not Allowed to Use Defendant’s Proffer Protected Statements to Increase Relevant Conduct Drug Amount Continue reading…

Intricately Related and 404(b) Evidence: Boilerplate Rules.

United States  v. Harris, No. 07-2195 (7th Cir. 08/06/2008).

Spencer Harris was convicted after a jury trial on five separate criminal counts: one count of distributing crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), one count of distributing powder cocaine, id. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), one count of possessing crack cocaine...

Intricately Related and 404(b) Evidence: Boilerplate Rules. Continue reading…

Speech Alone (Even Obscene Speech) Is Not Substantial Step For Attempt Solicitation

United States v. Gladish, No. 07-2718 (7th Cir. 07/31/2008).  A jury convicted the defendant of having violated two federal statutes: 18 U.S.C. § 1470, which prohibits knowingly transferring or attempting to transfer obscene material to a person under 16, and 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), which forbids knowingly attempting to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce...

Speech Alone (Even Obscene Speech) Is Not Substantial Step For Attempt Solicitation Continue reading…

7th Circuit Court of Appeals Explains Appellate Rule 35 and 40 Petitions for Rehearings:

Easley v. Reuss, 06-1646, ON PETITION FOR REHEARING. 

In her petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, Ms. Easley requests that this court revisit its prior decision.

We decline to do so, but we take this opportunity to explain our denial of further review in...

7th Circuit Court of Appeals Explains Appellate Rule 35 and 40 Petitions for Rehearings: Continue reading…